What Are the 4 Elements of a Crime in Minnesota?

An element of a crime, according to the United States justice system, is a fact the prosecution must prove to achieve a conviction in a criminal case. Also called elements of an offense, the prosecution must present evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt the defendant is guilty of committing the criminal offense in question. 

At Knutson + Casey, our seasoned criminal defense attorneys are here to provide the support and representation you need. With a deep understanding of Minnesota’s criminal justice system, we are committed to protecting your rights and fighting for the best possible outcome in your case. If you are being charged or investigated for a crime, contact our experienced Mankato criminal defense attorneys today. 

4 Elements of a Crime Committed in Mankato, Minnesota

Understanding the intricacies of criminal law is crucial for anyone facing charges or involved in legal proceedings. In Minnesota, as in all of the United States, crimes are evaluated based on four key elements. These elements form the foundation of any criminal case, guiding prosecutors and defense attorneys alike in their pursuit of justice. Under federal law, four main elements of a crime exist:

Mental State (Mens Rea)

Mens rea is Latin for “guilty mind.” The legal theory of mens rea refers to the element of criminal intent. The theory states that, to convict a defendant of a crime, the prosecution must establish the defendant’s criminal intent. The prosecution must show evidence that the defendant had a culpable mental state at the time of committing the crime. In other words, this means proving the defendant was in the right state of mind and had a conscious intent to commit the crime.

To convict a person of a crime, that person must have voluntarily, intentionally, knowingly, or purposefully committed the act in question. Failing to possess the mental intention to commit the crime could result in a not-guilty verdict since the defendant did not knowingly intend to break the law or cause bodily injury. This element of a crime will vary depending on the circumstances. In a murder case, for example, it is enough to establish proof of malice aforethought for mens rea. Other crimes may require knowing, willful, or reckless mens rea.

Conduct (Actus Reus)

The second element of a crime is actus reus, Latin for “guilty act.” Actus reus is a required element that means a criminal act or the criminal omission of an act must have actually occurred. It is not a crime to only have thought of an unlawful act or to think criminal thoughts. In other words, the criminal intent element required alone is not enough to convict a person of a crime. The defendant must have actually committed a crime.

Note that actus reus can refer to actions, omissions, or words. Unlike thoughts, words can constitute acts according to U.S. criminal law. Defamation, for example, is the crime of saying or publishing derogatory words about someone else. Perjury, threats, solicitation, and conspiracy are also word-related threats that can fulfill the element of actus reus in the U.S. criminal courts.

Concurrence

The prosecution cannot secure a defendant’s conviction by only proving mens rea or actus reus. The defendant must have both the criminal elements of mens rea and actus reus together – a guilty mind and the guilty act. Concurrence of the two must be present. Typically, the prosecution needs proof that the two occurred together at the same time to culminate in the crime in question. The guilty mind must coexist with or at least precede the guilty act. It does not necessarily matter whether mens rea was present up to the actus reus (such as premeditated crimes), as long as both concur at the same time during the criminal act. Mens rea must have motivated the conduct that led to the actus reus.

Causation

The fourth element of a crime is causation. The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the crime would not have happened were it not for the defendant’s direct participation. The prosecution must use evidence to establish a causal relationship between the defendant’s conduct and the crime in question.

Understanding Causation: Different Requirements Across Various Crimes

When it comes to determining guilt in criminal cases, one crucial element is causation. However, not all crimes have the same requirements for establishing causation. Causation differs across various types of crimes:

• Arson: The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s actions directly caused the fire that resulted in property damage or endangerment of life.
• Battery: Causation is established by demonstrating that the defendant’s physical actions directly led to the bodily harm or offensive touching of another person.
• Burglary: The crime of burglary requires showing that the defendant’s actions caused unlawful entry into a building with the intent to commit a crime inside.
• Child Sex Crimes: Causation involves proving that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in the sexual abuse or exploitation of a child.
• Cocaine Possession: Causation is established by demonstrating that the defendant’s intent elements of knowingly possessing cocaine, directly linking them to the illegal substance.
• Concealed Weapons: The prosecution must show that the defendant’s actions led to the concealment and possession of a prohibited weapon.
• Criminal Assault: Causation involves proving that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in the threat or infliction of physical bodily injury on another person.
• Disorderly Conduct: Causation may involve demonstrating that the defendant’s disruptive behavior directly led to public disturbance or breach of peace.
• Domestic Violence: The prosecution must establish that the defendant’s actions directly caused harm or fear to a household or family member.
• Drug Crimes: Causation involves proving that the defendant’s actions directly led to the possession, distribution, or manufacture of illegal drugs.
• Fraud: Causation may involve showing that the defendant’s deceptive actions directly resulted in financial loss or harm to another party.
• Grand Theft: The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in the unlawful taking of property valued above a certain threshold.
• Harassment: Causation involves demonstrating that the defendant’s actions directly led to unwanted and repeated communication or behavior causing distress.
• Homicide: The prosecution must establish that the defendant’s actions directly caused the death of another person.
• Juvenile Crimes: Causation may involve proving that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in illegal behavior or delinquency by a minor.
• Kidnapping: Causation is established by demonstrating that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in the unlawful abduction or confinement of another person.
• Manslaughter: The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s actions directly caused the death of another person but without the intent required for murder.
• Murder: Causation involves showing that the defendant’s actions directly caused the intentional and unlawful killing of another person.
• Sex Crimes: Causation may involve proving that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in sexual assault, rape, or other unlawful sexual conduct.
• Theft: Causation is established by demonstrating that the defendant’s actions directly led to the unlawful taking of another person’s property.
• Traffic Violations: Causation may involve proving that the defendant’s actions directly caused a traffic accident or violation of traffic laws.
• Trespassing: The prosecution must show that the defendant’s actions directly led to unlawful entry or presence on another person’s property.
• Violent Crimes: Causation involves demonstrating that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in physical harm or injury to another person.
• Vulnerable Adult Sexual Abuse: The prosecution must prove that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in the sexual abuse or exploitation of a vulnerable adult.
• Weapons Charges: Causation may involve showing that the defendant’s actions directly led to the possession or use of illegal weapons.
• Workplace Sexual Harassment: Causation is established by demonstrating that the defendant’s actions directly resulted in unwelcome sexual conduct or behavior in the workplace.

The requirements for establishing the elements of a crime vary depending on the type of crime involved. Prosecutors must provide evidence linking the defendant’s actions directly to the criminal conduct in question, ensuring a fair and just legal process.

Contact a Criminal Defense Lawyer for a Free Consultation

The element of causation also requires proof that actual harm occurred because of the crime. Different crimes have different requirements for the element of causation. Murder cases, for example, require an actual killing and death. Aggravated battery requires bodily injury. Without these damages, the act is presumed to not have happened, and the courts cannot find the defendant guilty of committing a crime. The prosecution must have all four elements of a crime for the courts to convict the defendant.

At Knutson + Casey, we understand the urgency of gathering crucial evidence to build a strong defense. That’s why our investigators spring into action immediately, obtaining photos, drone footage, accident reconstructions, vehicle inspections, government cam footage, and witness statements – all before evidence disappears. With our meticulous attention to detail and unwavering commitment to your case, you can trust us to provide the vigorous defense you deserve. Contact a Mankato criminal defense attorney today to schedule a free initial consultation and case evaluation with an experienced attorney. Give us a call at (507) 344-8888 or complete our contact form.